Picker Icon

Choose your layout

Color scheme

Get social with us!

This would indeed never be a problem with it framework; Sir John de- Keith d

This would indeed never be a problem with it framework; Sir John de- Keith d

Re: ? Comyn partner out of Malise

About the Comyn child who was wife from Malise out-of Strathearn, I got theorized from inside the 2005 one she was Margaret, recognized as spouse away from Sir John de Keith (come across duplicate away from blog post lower than) who was simply 2ndly age are provided for the reason that article: the partner Emma I would suggest are of another family, rather than mommy of 2nd Earl Malise.

Scots Peerage, sandwich _Comyn, Earl regarding Buchan_ , claims in part, ‘Malise, Earl out-of Strathearn, got a partner Emma, into the 1261-1267, whoever surname is actually unfamiliar ‘[SP II:256, alludes to Cal. of Docs., i. 2383, 2451]. a bit ahead of 1270, so as that their widow (Margaret) could have been “available” a bit after Emma.

This is needless to say a conjecture; it does have the advantage of handling a well-known relationships between Muriel Keith and Reginald le Cheyne. Any further associated records manage naturally feel greeting.

The latest membership inside the Scots Peerage about the group of Keith says regarding Sir John de Keith (d. california. 1270) he is said to have married Comyn, earl away from Buchan . It personality, of one’s not sure (“considered have been”) diversity, can now end up being fixed based on the following the dispensation, old from the Fondi on the 14 Jan 1378/9::

‘ Reg Aven 215, 50 Towards the bishop from Moray. Professors to help you dispense Reginald Cheyn, donzel, and you can Murielle, damselle, d de Keth, out of Moray and you will Aberdeen dioceses, from the impediment to help you matrimony as a result of the third and you will 4th quantities of consanguinity. Fondi, 19 Kal. Feb., anno step one. SRO Vat. Trans., iv, no. 46. ‘

Muriel Keith, the future next partner out of Robert Stewart, initially Duke from Albany (d. 1420), was contracted so you can get married Reginald ce Cheyne, young buck away from Sir Reginald le Cheyne from the their partner (as their particular first husband), Helen out-of Strathearn. When you are you’ll find prominent gaps regarding the origins out-of Muriel Keith, she and you will Reginald ce Cheyne create display a lineage on Comyns. But not, this will be as well faraway to require a great dispensation if Muriel is a good-great-higher grandd Comyn, Earl out-of Buchan (d. 1233), which would become circumstances in the event the is why child.

2. Reginald le Cheyne was a great-grandson regarding Marjory Comyn, child away from Alexander Comyn, Earl out-of Buchan (d. 1290), child from William Comyn in the above list. Her son try Malise, Earl off Strathearn regarding 1312 in order to his death in 1328 , and you can daddy regarding Reginald.

ca. 1270), was identical to Marjory Comyn, and you will partnered 2ndly so you’re able to Malise, Earl of Strathearn (d. 1312). This would imply the fresh new parentage a€?said to keeps been’ compared to Margaret, wife of Sir John de- Keith, is of one age bracket: she would n’t have already been the latest d Comyn, Earl out-of Buchan, but rather away from his son Alexander. There isn’t any proof one Earl Malise and you can Marjory Comyn was basically married far ahead of 1275: because Lindsay composed,

There’s you to definitely discernable foundation about what the connection between Reginald ce Cheyne and you will Muriel Keith would have existed: if the Margaret Comyn, spouse out of Sir John de- Keith (d

‘ The newest wife for the earl, regarding 1275, try called Marjory, once we see the attesting term from No. curriculum vitae., which can be stated by Wyntoun, Publication VIII. guy. vi., to own started the next cousin regarding John Comyn, Earl regarding Buchan, which discussed on behalf of Earl Malise the wedding settlement over mentioned [old in the London, April 26, 1293 getting their daughter Matilda and Robert de- Tony, young man out of Ralph].’

Alexander Comyn = Elizabeth de Quincy E away from Buchan I __________________I________________ I III step 1) Sir John = Marjory Preko web stranice = 2) Malise de Keith We (als I Elizabeth from Strathearn . 1270 I Margaret) We d. 1312 _____________I__ ___I__________________________ I We I We I We Sir William Bernard Malise Gilbert Robert Maud de- Keith de- Keith Elizabeth off = Robert d. bef 1293 Strathearn; d. 1328 de- Tony I ______I_______________________ We We We I Sir Edward Malise Mary Helen = Isabella de- E off Strathearn = 1) Sir Reginald Synton d. ca. 1343 We ce Cheyne We I We = 2) Sir David I V I We de Graham Sir William de I We__________ Keith I We = Margaret Fraser __________________I_______ V __I_____________ We We We III I I I We Muriel + Reginald Mary Mariota Keith ce Cheyne (= Robert Stewart, Duke from Albany)

No Comments

Give a Reply