Which 1999 law got a few significant wants: reducing prostitution (temporarily by the policing it and also in this new much time name of the altering public thinking on they) and you may cutting peoples trafficking getting sexual motives (Holmstrom Skilbrei, 2017)
A second categorization scheme distinguishes among criminalization, legalization (or regulation), and decriminalization. The first category can be divided into “criminalization of the client” and “criminalization of the seller” (Ostergen, 2017). A third typology, with four categories, comes from Garotalo Geymonat (2014): criminalization (or prohibition), regulation (or legalization), abolitionism, and decriminalization. With criminalization, a state completely outlaws the exchange of sex for money. Criminalization may apply to workers or to clients, as in Sweden. With controls, the state recognizes prostitution/sex work (only among adults and without any restrictions) and regulates the sexual activities. With abolitionism, prostitution/sex work is not illegal per se, but certain activities are declared illegal and banned, such as trafficking and third- party gain (as in brothels and pimping). Decriminalization, the newest category, has been occurring only since 2003, when New Zealand became the first country to adopt this policy. In New Zealand there is no specific law on sex work, and selling sex and sexual services is equal to any other economic activity. Danna (2014) has suggested two additional categories: neo-prohibi- tionism (the criminalization of the client) and neo-regulationism (non-punitive toward sellers).
The Swedish Sex Purchase Act was first presented as part of the Womens Peace Bill. Its purpose was “to combat prostitution, which was seen as harmful, both for those directly involved and for society at large” (Holmstrom Skilbrei, 2017, p. 83). To accomplish these goals, the law criminalized the clients ot prostitutes (as we know, the law does not use the term sex specialists). These clients, who commit a criminal offence, are punished with a fine and in theory even with prison (in 2011, the prison sentence increased from 6 months to 12 months), but only 200 cases are reported each year, and of these only 10% end in a fine or imprisonment (Garofalo Geymonat, 2014). Nonetheless, many other countries, including Norway, Iceland, France, and Ireland, have adopted the “Swedish model.”
Centered on Jonsson and you can Jakobsson (2017), discover a high rate out of social invited to have masters- titution/sex are employed in regions where prostitution/sex tasks are judge and/or managed than in countries in which it is unlawful otherwise criminalized
Two decades later, we could query: Did the fresh new Swedish Sex Buy Operate reach the goals? According to Holmstrom and Skilbrei (2017), it is extremely difficult to influence the results, or no, of your Swedish laws in the Sweden. Earliest, let us have a look at the newest law’s basic mission: the new reduced total of prostitution. Predicated on Kotsadam and you will Jakobsson (2014), prostitution is far more prominent where it is legal (as in Denmark) and less popular in which it is unlawful (like in Sweden). Yet not, “visibility” usually describes roadway prostitution. Since 1999, what amount of female (and dudes) whom offer sex on the street when you look at the Sweden enjoys reduced notably, but it is almost impossible to say United Kingdom escort an equivalent on the on the web prostitution. The new law’s 2nd objective would be to change society’s views on the prostitution.
For this reason, we are able to ending one to “the Sex Buy Operate has contributed to increased support on [Swedish] population to own forbidding not only purchasing sex also promoting sexual services” (Svedin, Jonsson, Kjellgren, Priebe, Akerman, 2012, p. 33). This means that, it appears that new Swedish people not simply highly likes its regulations in addition to believes your rules must also criminalize this new manufacturers. But so it faith works contrary to the main motives of one’s regulations, hence aims to cover the sufferers (the fresh sellers) and criminalize the clients (Holmstrom Skilbrei, 2017).
